Ask for a wrong worked example on purpose
Confident, plausible, incorrect: exactly the material you need for misconception-hunting, generated in seconds.
Jun 19, 2026 · 1 min read
Hand-crafting a convincingly wrong solution is slow. AI is excellent at it: ask for a worked example that commits one specific, common error while looking otherwise professional, and you have instant material for a "find the flaw" activity. The pedagogy is well evidenced; explaining the error in an incorrect example deepens conceptual understanding (Booth et al., 2013). AI just removes the production cost.
In practice
Write a worked solution to this problem that a confident Grade 9
student might produce, containing exactly one error: [the
misconception you're targeting]. Make the rest fully correct and
neatly presented. Do not label the error.- Project it and run "defend or demolish": pairs must either justify the solution or locate the flaw and explain why it's tempting.
- Always check the output yourself first. Models sometimes add a second, accidental error, and you want to know where the planted one is.
- This pairs with "Ask why the wrong answer is tempting" (Understanding): same pedagogy, now with unlimited material.
Quick takeaway: AI's most classroom-ready skill might be being wrong on demand.