Ask who wrote it before you read it
Historians check author, date and purpose before the first sentence. Students dive straight in. Teach the pause and everything they read changes.
Sep 22, 2026 · 1 min read
Wineburg (1991) watched historians and students read the same documents: the historians checked who wrote each one, when and why before touching the content, while students dove straight into the text. Sourcing is a habit of interrogation, not a box to tick, and it responds to explicit teaching. (Manning's sourcing-skill-builder skill builds this into a full novice-to-proficient progression with think-aloud scripts.) Thirty seconds of discipline before reading changes what students notice in every paragraph after it.
In practice
- Require three written answers before any content work: who made this, when, and for what purpose. No discussion of what the text says until those are down.
- Model the difference between mentioning and interrogating: 'a recruitment poster from 1915 will sell the war, so I will trust its mood more than its facts.'
- Ask for a prediction from the source line alone: what will this author emphasise, downplay or omit? Then read the document to test it.
- Check whether sourcing has become habitual by handing over a document you never flagged. Prompted sourcing is the developing stage; unprompted is the goal.
Quick takeaway: the attribution line is the first text, not the fine print.